Dense forests, winding shorelines, expansive grasslands and desert landscapes. America’s public lands are our playgrounds for exploring and seeking adventure. They keep nature in balance. They are where families fish, hike and pass down outdoor traditions. They make local economies stronger.
But threats to our country’s public lands are growing. Over the past year, there have been proposals to sell off millions of acres of public lands for non-conservation uses, including mining, drilling and development. If our public lands—like national parks, national forests and wildlife refuges—are sold and developed, iconic landscapes could be destroyed and public access would disappear.
Americans put their trust in land managers, park rangers, wildland firefighters and others to steward our nation’s natural legacy for future generations. Ninety three percent of Americans agree that one of the things our government does best is to protect and preserve our national history and natural beauty.
Congress, therefore, must stand up for public lands. It must keep public lands in public hands.
Speak Up for Nature
Take Action
Add your name to tell your congressional leaders that are public lands are not for sale.
Public lands support our way of life
Public lands belong to all of us—they should not be sold off to the highest bidder.
Under the careful and responsible management of federal land agencies, America’s public landscapes help meet the needs of people and nature. Congress and our federal agencies should be focusing on the long-term care of and investment in our public lands.
There are already laws and processes in place that authorize the federal government to identify lands that don’t serve conservation needs which can be sold to support further conservation investments. Examples include selling parcels that have been identified through a planning process as having low conservation value and being scattered, isolated or otherwise challenging and expensive to manage. These decisions should be done in consultation with stakeholders through a transparent and science-driven process.
We need these processes because any sort of sale of the public’s protected, natural landscapes is irreversible and would erase these landscapes’ natural benefits. That’s why The Nature Conservancy opposes any large-scale sell-off of federally owned lands for non-conservation uses.
High Support for Public Lands
Americans overwhelmingly agree—we must protect and invest in public lands and waters—even in tough budget times.
-
80%
Western voters who oppose the federal government selling public lands across the West to private interests.
-
93%
American voters who want to continue to use fees from oil and gas drilling to fund the Land and Water Conservation Fund.
-
89%
Voters who agree that even with federal budget problems, funding to safeguard land, air and water should not be cut.
-
79%
Western voters who support maintaining funding for public lands, including the park rangers, wildfire crews and scientists who safeguard these places
-
78%
Americans who prefer spending LWCF funds on land, water and wildlife protection over diverting them to roads and infrastructure on public lands.
-
47%
Western voters who oppose states taking over the ownership and management of public lands compared to 32% who support.
National agencies are better prepared than states to manage our public lands
Some states across the country are recommending that the federal government transfer the ownership and management of our public lands to state control. At first glance, this proposal could seem like a smart direction, but most states don’t have the staff resources or budget to successfully steward public lands. And when you transfer public lands to state management, that state and its taxpayers are also responsible for all associated costs such as preventing and fighting wildfires, managing recreation and visitation, and responding to flood and drought.
This could lead to more problems, including exploiting public lands by mining, drilling, or overharvesting forests to cover management costs. It could also open the door to future sell-offs as states struggle to balance budgets.
A 2026 economic report showed that if Idaho took on the ownership and management of its federal public lands, it would cost the state’s taxpayers over $837 million per year. That’s over 15% of Idaho’s entire annual budget.
The simple truth is that federal agencies—like the National Park Service and U.S. Forest Service—are more prepared and better resourced to safeguard national public lands. We should be investing more into the care and management of our public lands—not transferring or selling off these national treasures.
Defend LWCF
For more than 60 years, the Land and Water Conservation Fund has protected millions of acres of natural landscapes in every county in the U.S. But new federal guidelines are making it harder to use existing resources and funding to invest in conservation of our public lands and waters.
Tell Congress now to defend LWCF and oppose creating new roadblocks for critical LWCF projects.
Public lands for the public good
The federal government has, for decades, helped conserve, restore and manage large natural landscapes. And this work is vital because public lands:
- Safeguard our traditions of hunting, fishing and other outdoor recreation by maintaining and increasing access to these landscapes.
- Drive a $1.2 trillion outdoor economy that supports communities across America, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis.
- Provide food and shelter for a wide variety of plants and animals.
One of the best tools to strengthen our public lands and ensure they are accessible to all Americans is the Land and Water Conservation Fund. The Great American Outdoors Act, signed into law in 2020, provides mandatory funding for LWCF at no less than $900 million a year. And this funding comes entirely from the proceeds from offshore oil and gas leasing. None of this money comes from American taxpayers. LWCF has an incredibly successful history but it needs support from Congress and the Administration for full implementation.