Mark Stern, Forest Initiative Lead for the Conservancy in Oregon
Dry-side forests in eastern and southern Oregon are in trouble, as are the people and wildlife they support.
That’s why Governor Kitzhaber and state legislative leaders recently studied whether more forest restoration might prevent future damage — and even incur long-term benefits. The report analyzed input from agencies, businesses, local communities and conservation organizations, including The Nature Conservancy.
Decades of fire suppression have resulted in overcrowded forests in urgent need of thinning, controlled burns or other treatments to stave off invasive species, disease and unnaturally severe wildfire. This year alone, 1 million acres burned in Oregon, costing $100 million to fight.
“We must stop putting our nation’s firefighters in danger while important natural resources go up in smoke,” said Mark Stern, Forest Initiative Lead for the Conservancy in Oregon. “It’s time to put the wood in these overstocked forests to work for our nation and local communities in ways that will also benefit the unique wildlife found in Oregon’s forests.”
The report’s findings are clear: increased funding to double the number of acres treated annually (from 129,000 to 250,000) will likely yield high returns.
Specifically, while the cost would be double — twice the $40.8 million currently spent on restoration by the U.S. Forest Service each year in Oregon — the healthier forests would generate $5.7 million in economic returns for every $1 million spent. And, in addition to minimizing the occurrence of large and devastating wildfires, increased investments will:
The Nature Conservancy and its partners hope this study bolsters efforts across the state to restore forest and economic health. “Together, we can work to secure a dedicated funding stream that supports increasing the scale of restoration,” said Stern, “for the benefit of local economies and the environment.”
You can find out more by downloading the Full Report and the Executive Summary.